NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
12720 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+81500%
65.28 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Apr 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
100
SM Count
-
12800
Shading Units
80
400
TMUs
8
176
ROPs
4
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
17W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Cedar
AD102
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
