CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro S9170
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro S9170
VS
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
AMD FirePro S9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
9984 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+1146%
65.28 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
VS
FirePro S9170
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Jul 2015
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
100
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
44
12800
Shading Units
2816
400
TMUs
176
176
ROPs
64
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
72 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Hawaii
AD102
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
275W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
2
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
4
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 5490
5
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
6
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
8
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
9
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
10
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A5000-8Q
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy