NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2550MHz
4608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 576.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+165%
65.28 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
24.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
100
SM Count
-
12800
Shading Units
8192
400
TMUs
512
176
ROPs
512
400
Tensor Cores
128
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
450W
600 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
22 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
