NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
10496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+1039%
65.28 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5.728 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Apr 2017
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
100
SM Count
-
12800
Shading Units
2304
400
TMUs
144
176
ROPs
32
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
72 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Ellesmere
AD102
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
