NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
9632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+11744%
32.69 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 360M
0.276 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
12
9728
Shading Units
96
304
TMUs
32
112
ROPs
8
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
275.7 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
38W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
N11E-GS1-A3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
