NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX Go540
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX Go540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 7.200GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX Go540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2004
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Quadro FX Go
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
225 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
7.200GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
-
304
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
4
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
NV43
-
GPU Variant
QDFX-GO540-N-A4
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
110 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0
