NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1680MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 307.2GB/s)
8704 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+1241%
32.69 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 16
2.437 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
815 MHz
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
1024bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
307.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
1024
304
TMUs
64
112
ROPs
32
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.16 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.874 TFLOPS
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.437 TFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Vega 12
-
GPU Variant
Vega 12 XLA
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
379 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.3
