Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
9720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation +148490%
32.69 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
76
SM Count
1
9728
Shading Units
8
304
TMUs
4
112
ROPs
4
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

120W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GE
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy