Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs AMD FireStream 9250

NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 5880 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2460MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
13280 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 285W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5880 Ada Generation +6827%
69.27 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
2460 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
110
SM Count
-
14080
Shading Units
800
440
TMUs
40
176
ROPs
16
440
Tensor Cores
-
110
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
72 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

433.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
1082 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
69.27 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
69.27 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
1082 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

285W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
RV770
AD102
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy