Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireMV 2250

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
18176 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Jan 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
-
568
TMUs
4
192
ROPs
4
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
32W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
RV516
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy