Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
18176 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
-
568
TMUs
4
192
ROPs
4
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
20W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
RV380
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy