NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
18064 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+33751%
91.06 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Nov 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
640MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
142
SM Count
14
18176
Shading Units
112
568
TMUs
28
192
ROPs
20
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
G80
AD102
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.0
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
