NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs Intel Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (2505MHz vs 1750MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
17408 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada
+3287%
91.06 TFLOPS
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 6000 Ada
+757%
26240
Arc A310
3061
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX 6000 Ada
+744%
12629
Arc A310
1496
3DMark Speed Way
RTX 6000 Ada
+3360%
8028
Arc A310
232
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro Ada
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
768
568
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
16
568
Tensor Cores
96
142
RT Cores
6
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
30W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
DG2-128
AD102
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
