Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs Intel Arc A350

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (2505MHz vs 2000MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
17408 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +2864%
91.06 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Ada
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
768
568
TMUs
48
192
ROPs
24
568
Tensor Cores
96
142
RT Cores
6
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
25W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
DG2-128
AD102
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy