Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs Intel Arc Pro A40

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs Intel Arc Pro A40

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (2535MHz vs 1700MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
17152 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +2546%
92.15 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40
3.482 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Ada
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

2175 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
96bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

142
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
18176
Shading Units
1024
568
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
32
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
8
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

486.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
1440 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
92.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
92.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
1440 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
DG2-128
AD102
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
6 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
608 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy