Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (2535MHz vs 1837MHz)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (96GB vs 48GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 768.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +48%
92.15 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Jan 2024
Quadro Ada
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2175 MHz
Base Clock
1665 MHz
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

142
SM Count
132
-
Compute Units
-
18176
Shading Units
16896
568
TMUs
528
192
ROPs
24
568
Tensor Cores
528
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB

Theoretical Performance

486.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
1440 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
92.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
92.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
1440 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GB100
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
5 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
208 billion
608 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

300W
TDP
1000W
700 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
9.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy