Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (2505MHz vs 1695MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 231.9GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe
4.339 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada +1998%
91.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Dec 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
142
1280
Shading Units
18176
40
TMUs
568
32
ROPs
192
40
Tensor Cores
568
10
RT Cores
142
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
76.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy