Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA P102 100

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA P102 100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 5GB VRAM P102 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (2505MHz vs 1683MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 440.3GB/s)
14976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +745%
91.06 TFLOPS
P102 100
10.77 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Ada
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
1582 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1376 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5X
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
440.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
142
SM Count
25
18176
Shading Units
3200
568
TMUs
200
192
ROPs
80
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.6 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.6 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
168.3 GFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.77 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
336.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GP102
AD102
GPU Variant
GP102-100-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
16 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.8
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy