Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA P102 101

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA P102 101

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 10GB VRAM P102 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 52% (2535MHz vs 1670MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 10GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 320.3GB/s)
14976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +762%
92.15 TFLOPS
P102 101
10.69 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Jan 2018
Quadro Ada
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

2175 MHz
Base Clock
1557 MHz
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
1670 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.3GB/s

Render Config

142
SM Count
25
-
Compute Units
-
18176
Shading Units
3200
568
TMUs
200
192
ROPs
80
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
0 MB

Theoretical Performance

486.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.6 GPixel/s
1440 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
334.0 GTexel/s
92.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
167.0 GFLOPS
92.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.69 TFLOPS
1440 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
334.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GP102
AD102
GPU Variant
GP102-101-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
16 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
608 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy