Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA PG506 242

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 76% (2535MHz vs 1440MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 24GB)
14592 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 768.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (165W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +792%
92.15 TFLOPS
PG506 242
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Ada
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2175 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

142
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
18176
Shading Units
3584
568
TMUs
224
192
ROPs
96
568
Tensor Cores
224
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB

Theoretical Performance

486.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
1440 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
92.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
92.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
1440 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GA100
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
7 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
608 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
165W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy