Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and a Professional market GPU: 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (2505MHz vs 1800MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 768.0GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +135%
91.06 TFLOPS
RTX A6000
38.71 TFLOPS
Battlefield 5 1080p
RTX 6000 Ada
200
RTX A6000
200
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
142
SM Count
84
18176
Shading Units
10752
568
TMUs
336
192
ROPs
112
568
Tensor Cores
336
142
RT Cores
84
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GA102
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.8
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy