Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
18096 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +87457%
91.06 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6250
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Ada
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
80
568
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
19W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
Cedar
AD102
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy