Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1627MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded
6.664 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +121%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1192 MHz
Base Clock
-
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
8192
64
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy