NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1627MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded
+941%
6.664 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
0.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1192 MHz
Base Clock
-
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
4
2048
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
16
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GA10B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
