CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
VS
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1627MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded
+941%
6.664 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
0.64 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Embedded
VS
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1192 MHz
Base Clock
-
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
16
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GA10B
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Board Design
60W
TDP
10W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
2
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
3
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
4
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla K10
5
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
6
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A4500
7
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
8
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
9
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
10
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy