Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded +22879%
6.664 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1192 MHz
Base Clock
-
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
2
2048
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

60W
TDP
21W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
G86
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.21 billion
Unknown
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy