Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1140MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (132.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB +9793%
5.837 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

652 MHz
Base Clock
-
1140 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
132.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
4
2560
Shading Units
32
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
91.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
5.837 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.837 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

60W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy