Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1950MHz vs 1612MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded +106%
8.253 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
3.994 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
1600 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
8
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

60W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net