CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
VS
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
NVIDIA GRID K160Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+2431%
8.253 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
VS
GRID K160Q
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.27 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
2
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
4
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
5
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m
6
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 7000
7
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
8
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
9
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
10
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
Related News
1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy