Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1612MHz vs 1493MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded +619%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro P520 Mobile
1.147 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A2000 Embedded +2604%
2001
Quadro P520 Mobile
74
OctaneBench
RTX A2000 Embedded +1326%
271
Quadro P520 Mobile
19

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
1303 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
3
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.89 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.83 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
17.92 GFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1147 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.83 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
18W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GP108
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net