NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1700MHz vs 1612MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
10752 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250
+448%
45.26 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
208
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
13312
80
TMUs
832
48
ROPs
0
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Ampere
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
58.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
