NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1650MHz vs 1207MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+143%
6.18 TFLOPS
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.534 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2020
Ampere-MW
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
24
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.60 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
79.20 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.069 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.534 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
633.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
DG1
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.1
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
