NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1455MHz vs 1207MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
6.18 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+44%
8.94 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
24
2560
Shading Units
3072
80
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
48
80
Tensor Cores
96
20
RT Cores
24
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
