Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Instinct MI300A

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (2100MHz vs 1358MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
12032 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
6.953 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +1663%
122.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

893 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1358 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
228
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
14592
80
TMUs
880
48
ROPs
0
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
6.953 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
6.953 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
108.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
760W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
12 billion
Transistors
146 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy