CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
VS
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+203%
6.953 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
VS
GRID K260Q
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
893 MHz
Base Clock
-
1358 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1536
80
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
65.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
6.953 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.953 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
108.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
2
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile
4
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
5
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL
6
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
7
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID M60 1Q
8
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
9
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB
10
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
Related News
1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy