Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile +1875%
6.953 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

893 MHz
Base Clock
-
1358 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
16
2560
Shading Units
128
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.20 GTexel/s
6.953 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.953 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
108.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

95W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy