Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM Quadro FX 470 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
2544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile +15351%
6.953 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 470
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

893 MHz
Base Clock
-
1358 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Type
System Shared
128bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

20
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.640 GTexel/s
6.953 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.953 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
108.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
C79
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
-
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

95W
TDP
38W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy