NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1687MHz vs 1200MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
7.987 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
+8%
8.637 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A2000
+20%
5936
RTX A2000 Mobile
4917
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX A2000
2712
RTX A2000 Mobile
+4%
2836
3DMark Speed Way
RTX A2000
+14%
1480
RTX A2000 Mobile
1290
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
1215 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
20
3328
Shading Units
2560
104
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
48
104
Tensor Cores
80
26
RT Cores
20
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
95W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
GA107
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
12 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
