NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 54% (1687MHz vs 1098MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+514%
8.637 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A2000 Mobile
+316%
4917
Quadro M2000M
1180
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX A2000 Mobile
+413%
2836
Quadro M2000M
552
Blender
RTX A2000 Mobile
+825%
1222
Quadro M2000M
132
OctaneBench
RTX A2000 Mobile
+147%
84
Quadro M2000M
34
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Dec 2015
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
640
80
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
