Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile +23875%
6.953 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

893 MHz
Base Clock
-
1358 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

65.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
6.953 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.953 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
108.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
12 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

95W
TDP
21W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy