NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1687MHz vs 1500MHz)
Lower TDP (95W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
8.637 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI25
+42%
12.29 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2017
Ampere-MW
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
1400 MHz
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
64
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
