Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +2350%
7.987 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Ampere
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
192
104
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GK107
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy