NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
3280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+6785%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
6
3328
Shading Units
48
104
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
GT216
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
