Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA GRID M40

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA GRID M40

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 8GB VRAM GRID M40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M40 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +907%
7.987 TFLOPS
GRID M40
0.793 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro Ampere
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
384
104
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
793.3 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GM107
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net