Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

NVIDIA RTX A2000
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 4100
NVIDIA RTX A2000
NVIDIA Quadro 4100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +272%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.02GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
1344
104
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.32 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.26 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.142 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.26 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GK104
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy