Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40d

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40d

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40d to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1200MHz vs 876MHz)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 245W)
NVIDIA Tesla K40d 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +58%
7.987 TFLOPS
Tesla K40d
5.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Nov 2013
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
745 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
2880
104
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
48
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
245W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GK110B
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy