NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A4 Mobile and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4 Mobile
+1469%
7.25 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1297 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
24
2048
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
24
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
113.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
7.250 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
113.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
