NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 73W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
+1779%
2.706 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
120
24
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
73W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
