Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD FirePro S9170

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD FirePro S9170

NVIDIA RTX A400
VS
AMD FirePro S9170
NVIDIA RTX A400
AMD FirePro S9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170 +93%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Jul 2015
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
2816
24
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy