Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI FirePro V3700

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI FirePro V3700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400 +4128%
2.706 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
40
24
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy