Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI FirePro V8700

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI FirePro V8700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 151W)
ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400 +125%
2.706 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
800
24
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
151W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy